Charles Osbourne’s W.H. Auden: The Life of a Poet

 

PAPERMAC, 1982, £4.95

ISBN: 0 333 329546

At the Great Writing Conference in London this summer, Kate Coles gave a talk on revision. She mentioned W.H. Auden’s poem “September 1, 1939” and detailed Auden’s change from the famous line “We must love one another or die” to “We must love one another and die.”

When Kate told this anecdote, I realized I don’t know nearly enough about Auden or his work. After picking up W.H. Auden: The Life of a Poet, I’ve gleaned a few things:

  1. Auden first changed that famous line, then cut the stanza altogether, and later pulled the poem entirely from his complete works. As Auden explained it, “The whole poem, I realized, was infected with an incurable dishonesty—and must be scrapped” (195). Many folks think Auden’s revisions didn’t make his poems better.
  2. Auden thought that a poem starts “in the guts and only flowers in the head” (96). That is, in order for a poem to work, the instinct has got to lead the intellect and not the other way around. The challenge of writing is that “just when the Daemon is going to speak, the Prig claps his hand over his mouth and edits it” (96). Amen.
  3. Reflecting back on his political poems, Auden believed that “Political social history would be no different if Dante, Michelangelo, Byron had never lived. The arts can’t do anything about this. Only political action and straight journalistic reportage can. I feel a little guilty,” he continued, “about some things I wrote in the thirties. Nothing I wrote against Hitler prevented one Jew being killed” (291). Here I thought about June Jordan’s Berkeley commencement speech, “Of Those So Close Beside Me, Which are You?” wherein she describes a party where Ralph Ellison had a similar revelation about the worth of his writing and then didn’t write much after that. June recalls his presence quieting the room when he asked the company to, “Look at Germany! All of that music, all of that poetry, and those novels and the paintings and did any of it ever stop a single Nazi from pushing a single human being into the oven?” Perhaps the arts won’t ever change politics. But I can’t imagine going through rough times without poetry and paintings and novels and music. Jordan says later in the essay, “I do not accept that immersion into our collective quest for things beautiful will cripple our own abilities to honor the right of all human beings to survive.” Yes. Poetry may not create the change, but it creates the balm. And we need both.
  4. Auden wrote a pornographic poem, “The Platonic Blow,” which was eventually published as a small booklet with drawings by Joe Brainard.

UNR Youth Writing Program

Today I visited UNR’s Youth Writing Program. These young students were full of smart, inventive lines and made some remarkable collaborative poems.

Some folks (thanks, Matt!) asked for the slides from my presentation. You can see them at the link below.

UNR youth writing program

Artaud and the surrealists

Costume_design_by_Pablo_Picasso_representing_skyscrapers_and_boulevards__Paris_18_May_1917

http://jacket2.org/commentary/artaud-and-surrealists

From the latest post at Jacket2:

“Even further, Artaud sets Marxism against poetry. He declares: “I call poetry today the understanding of this internal and dynamic destiny of thought.”[11] He goes on to say that “poetic understanding is internal, poetic quality is internal. There is a movement today to identify the poetry of the poets with that internal magic force which provides a path for life and makes it possible to act upon life.”[12] For the Surrealists poetry was synonymous with Surrealism, which is why in the beginning of his essay, Artaud makes a point to differentiate Surrealism’s beginnings from where it eventually headed. He describes “that hunger for a pure life which Surrealism was in the beginning” and maintains that this initial impulse “had nothing to do with the fragmentary life of Marxism.”[13]”